FDA Warning Letters on Peptides: A Running Tracker
FDA warning letters that name peptide drugs, by category, with what FDA cited and a link to each letter. We found 149 since January 2025.
U.S. status checked
News, not medical advice. Full disclaimer.
What happened / Why it matters
What happened. Since January 2025, FDA has posted at least 149 warning letters that name a peptide drug, according to FDA’s published letters: 72 dated 2025 and 77 dated 2026 so far. The latest we found is dated Oct. 30, 2026. This page lists them by category, with what FDA cited and a link to each letter on fda.gov.
Why it matters. Warning letters are one of the clearest public signals of how FDA reads the rules for sellers, pharmacies, telehealth companies and manufacturers of peptide drugs. They are also easy to misread. Each one is FDA’s position on specific facts at its date. None is a court ruling or a penalty. This tracker states what the letters say and nothing more.
How to read this tracker
- Everything here is attributed to FDA. “FDA said” means the letter says it. We do not characterize the companies, and we do not name them: each row links to the letter itself.
- A letter is not a ruling. It states findings and invites a response. We have not checked responses, closures or any later action.
- A product is not a molecule. Semaglutide, tirzepatide, liraglutide, tesamorelin and bremelanotide have FDA-approved products. When FDA calls something an “unapproved new drug,” it is talking about that company’s product, not saying the molecule itself is unapproved.
- The list may be incomplete. FDA’s search may not index every letter, and some are posted weeks after their date. Treat the counts as “at least.”
- Dates are the letters’ issue dates.
| Category | Letters found |
|---|---|
| “Research peptide” sellers | 12 |
| Compounding pharmacies, repackagers and manufacturers (after inspections) | 10 |
| Manufacturers and distributors of active ingredients (API) | 3 |
| Online pharmacies | 8 |
| Holders of approved products (promotion and reporting) | 5 |
| Telehealth companies promoting compounded GLP-1 drugs | 111 |
| Total | 149 |
“Research peptide” sellers
On Aug. 24, 2026, FDA issued five letters to sellers of products labeled for research use, and on March 31, 2026 it issued five more. In the letters we read, FDA said “research use only” and similar labels did not change its conclusion, because evidence on the sellers’ websites established that the products were intended for human use. Our analysis of those letters explains the reasoning and what a letter does not prove.
| Date | What FDA cited | Letter |
|---|---|---|
| Aug. 24, 2026 | Products labeled as semaglutide, tirzepatide, retatrutide, tesamorelin, PT-141 and SS-31, plus bacteriostatic water, are unapproved new drugs; “research use only” labels did not change FDA’s conclusion. | WL 735067 |
| Aug. 24, 2026 | Products labeled as tirzepatide, semaglutide, retatrutide, SS-31, PT-141, tesamorelin and a tesamorelin-ipamorelin blend are unapproved new drugs; “research use only” labels did not change FDA’s conclusion. | WL 734884 |
| Aug. 24, 2026 | Products labeled as semaglutide, tirzepatide, retatrutide, tesamorelin, PT-141 and SS-31, plus a reconstitution solution, are unapproved new drugs; “research use only” labels did not change FDA’s conclusion. | WL 735063 |
| Aug. 24, 2026 | Products labeled as retatrutide, semaglutide, tesamorelin, PT-141 and SS-31, plus bacteriostatic water, are unapproved new drugs; “research use only” labels did not change FDA’s conclusion. | WL 735127 |
| Aug. 24, 2026 | Products named “GLP-1 Sema Research Peptide,” “GLP-2 Tirz Peptide,” retatrutide, survodutide, mazdutide, tesamorelin, PT-141 and a tesamorelin-ipamorelin blend, plus bacteriostatic water, are unapproved new drugs; research labels did not change FDA’s conclusion. | WL 733652 |
| June 17, 2026 | A product called Prostamax and a gonadorelin product are unapproved new drugs. | WL 729447 |
| Mar. 31, 2026 | Website offered cagrilintide, mazdutide and products labeled as semaglutide, tirzepatide and retatrutide, plus “BAC water”; FDA said they are unapproved new drugs, and that “laboratory research” labels did not change its conclusion. | WL 721805 |
| Mar. 31, 2026 | Website offered products labeled as GLP-1, GLP-2 and GLP-3 drugs, plus bacteriostatic water; FDA said they are unapproved new drugs. | WL 721709 |
| Mar. 31, 2026 | FDA said that, despite “in vitro research and educational purposes only” labels, evidence on the website establishes the products (retatrutide, semaglutide, tirzepatide) are intended for human use. | WL 721600 |
| Mar. 31, 2026 | FDA said that, despite “laboratory research purposes only” and “not for human consumption” labels, evidence on the website establishes the products (retatrutide, tirzepatide) are intended for human use. | WL 721088 |
| Mar. 31, 2026 | FDA said that, despite “Research Use Only” labels, evidence on the website establishes the products (retatrutide, tirzepatide) are intended for human use. | WL 721806 |
| Feb. 26, 2025 | A website introduced unapproved and misbranded semaglutide and tirzepatide drug products into interstate commerce. | WL 696885 |
Compounding pharmacies, repackagers and manufacturers (after inspections)
These letters followed FDA inspections of facilities that make or repackage compounded drugs.
| Date | What FDA cited | Letter |
|---|---|---|
| Sept. 18, 2026 | Compounded tirzepatide-niacinamide and semaglutide-cyanocobalamin products “appear to be essentially copies” of approved drugs; FDA also cited insanitary conditions and manufacturing violations. | WL 738238 |
| Apr. 14, 2026 | Semaglutide and tirzepatide multi-dose vial products are unapproved new drugs. | WL 725661 |
| Apr. 7, 2026 | Letter refers to a voluntary recall by the firm of tirzepatide injection and semaglutide multidose vial lots. | WL 723704 |
| Feb. 9, 2026 | No approved applications on file for drug products the firm repackages, such as a tirzepatide-cyanocobalamin injection. | WL 714891 |
| Jan. 20, 2026 | No approved applications on file for repackaged drug products such as semaglutide, tirzepatide and retatrutide. | WL 718739 |
| Jan. 16, 2026 | Semaglutide and tirzepatide injections are adulterated under section 501(c). | WL 717525 |
| Dec. 1, 2025 | Labels of tirzepatide and semaglutide injections lacked required information, including a list of active and inactive ingredients. | WL 717972 |
| Oct. 10, 2025 | Sterile drug products, including semaglutide, were prepared, packed or held under insanitary conditions. | WL 715795 |
| Apr. 8, 2025 | Labels of semaglutide and tirzepatide injections lacked required statements. | WL 703497 |
| Mar. 4, 2025 | Labels of semaglutide and tirzepatide products lacked the statement “This is a compounded drug.” | WL 696742 |
Active ingredient manufacturers and distributors
| Date | What FDA cited | Letter |
|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2026 | The firm’s semaglutide API is misbranded under sections 502(a) and 502(b)(1). | WL 723330 |
| Dec. 8, 2025 | Retatrutide is “a GLP-1 API that is not identified as an active ingredient in any drug approved by FDA”; FDA said the firm distributed it to pharmacies seeking to compound. | WL 716152 |
| Sept. 11, 2025 | The firm had not conducted process validation for the semaglutide API manufactured at its site. | WL 711330 |
Online pharmacies
| Date | What FDA cited | Letter |
|---|---|---|
| Sept. 24, 2026 | A website introduced unapproved and misbranded semaglutide drug products into interstate commerce. | WL 737810 |
| Sept. 23, 2026 | A website introduced unapproved and misbranded semaglutide drug products into interstate commerce. | WL 737806 |
| Sept. 10, 2025 | A website introduced unapproved and misbranded semaglutide drug products into interstate commerce. | WL 715595 |
| July 29, 2025 | Labeling for semaglutide drug products fails to bear adequate directions for use, so they are misbranded under section 502(f)(1). | WL 705501 |
| June 12, 2025 | A website introduced unapproved and misbranded semaglutide drug products into interstate commerce. | WL 706335 |
| May 5, 2025 | A website introduced unapproved and misbranded semaglutide drug products into interstate commerce. | WL 703470 |
| Apr. 23, 2025 | A website introduced unapproved and misbranded semaglutide drug products into interstate commerce. | WL 700358 |
| Jan. 13, 2025 | A website introduced unapproved and misbranded semaglutide and opioid drug products into interstate commerce. | WL 695815 |
Holders of approved products
These letters went to companies that hold approved applications for products with these active ingredients.
| Date | What FDA cited | Letter |
|---|---|---|
| Mar. 5, 2026 | Letter to an application holder for products including semaglutide and liraglutide, about written procedures for surveillance, receipt and evaluation of adverse drug experience reports. | WL 717576 |
| Sept. 9, 2025 | Letter to an application holder for semaglutide and liraglutide products: FDA determined that a promotional video is false or misleading. | WL 716495 |
| Sept. 9, 2025 | Letter to an application holder for a tirzepatide product: FDA determined that a promotional video is false or misleading. | WL 716485 |
| Sept. 9, 2025 | Letter to an application holder for a tirzepatide product: FDA determined that a promotional video is false or misleading. | WL 716475 |
| Sept. 9, 2025 | Letter to an application holder for a tirzepatide product: FDA determined that a promotional video is false or misleading. | WL 716462 |
Telehealth companies promoting compounded GLP-1 drugs
FDA has sent 111 letters to telehealth companies since September 2025, in four groups. The letters most often say that a company’s claims implied its compounded product is the same as an FDA-approved product, or has been FDA-approved or otherwise evaluated for safety and effectiveness, when it has not, or that claims about compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide are false or misleading. FDA’s page for telehealth companies says that promoting compounded drugs with false or misleading claims “violates federal law” and that FDA does not approve or license pharmacy facilities.
| Date | Letters | Example letter |
|---|---|---|
| Sept. 9, 2025 | 55 | WL 715878, WL 716828, WL 719809 |
| Feb. 20, 2026 | 30 | WL 717985 |
| June 8, 2026 | 25 | WL 728295 |
| Oct. 30, 2026 | 1 | WL 737905 |
We list the telehealth group by date rather than letter by letter. Every letter is on FDA’s warning letters page.
What is not in this tracker
- Letters that matched our searches but do not cite a peptide drug, such as a supplement ingredient or a cosmetic. We left five of those out.
- Import alerts, recalls and consumer notices.
- Letters FDA closed without a published letter, and any response or closure letter after a warning.
- Letters from before Jan. 1, 2025.
What this means for a reader
- A warning letter says something about a company’s conduct or product, not about whether you can safely use a particular medicine. Compounded drugs are not FDA-approved, and FDA does not review compounded drugs for safety, effectiveness or quality before they are marketed.
- For questions about a medicine you take or are considering, talk with a licensed clinician. FDA’s MedWatch program takes reports of serious reactions.
- We do not link to sellers or give dosing, preparation or purchasing guidance.
U.S. regulatory status checked Nov. 3, 2026. We update this page when we find new letters; changes are noted with a visible date.
The email isn’t open yet
There’s no email sign-up yet, and we don’t collect email addresses. Every edition is published here for free.
Read the latest edition →Sources
Written and edited by the Best Peptides Today Editorial Team. How we work.